<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If there was an Obama look alike contest&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://casaveneracion.com/if-there-was-an-obama-look-alike-contest/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://casaveneracion.com/if-there-was-an-obama-look-alike-contest/</link>
	<description>The Sassy Lawyer &#38; Pinoy Cook on food, family and home.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 12:56:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ponderlicious</title>
		<link>http://casaveneracion.com/if-there-was-an-obama-look-alike-contest/comment-page-1/#comment-38133</link>
		<dc:creator>ponderlicious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 06:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://houseonahill.net/?p=6525#comment-38133</guid>
		<description>&quot;If I was&quot; vs &quot;If I were.&quot;
It is nice to see someone talking about correct grammar nowadays. And you can see how being clear grammatically actually affects the clarity of what you are trying to say. I&#039;ve was taught that the difference is one of possibility. If the situation could possibly be true (no matter how much of a stretch), then you use &quot;was,&quot; but if there is no way it could be possible, then use &quot;were.&quot; An example:
If I was President, I would not raise taxes. (It is possible I could be President, but it is a long stretch.)

If I were a tape recorder, then I would be a good one. (Impossible.)

This actually brings up the question of what IS possible in reality. Some people believe anything is possible, so for that crowd, they should always use &quot;was.&quot; For those who are more realistic, then they have to decide each time whether what they are saying is realistically possible or not.

Good question though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If I was&#8221; vs &#8220;If I were.&#8221;<br />
It is nice to see someone talking about correct grammar nowadays. And you can see how being clear grammatically actually affects the clarity of what you are trying to say. I&#8217;ve was taught that the difference is one of possibility. If the situation could possibly be true (no matter how much of a stretch), then you use &#8220;was,&#8221; but if there is no way it could be possible, then use &#8220;were.&#8221; An example:<br />
If I was President, I would not raise taxes. (It is possible I could be President, but it is a long stretch.)</p>
<p>If I were a tape recorder, then I would be a good one. (Impossible.)</p>
<p>This actually brings up the question of what IS possible in reality. Some people believe anything is possible, so for that crowd, they should always use &#8220;was.&#8221; For those who are more realistic, then they have to decide each time whether what they are saying is realistically possible or not.</p>
<p>Good question though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ant</title>
		<link>http://casaveneracion.com/if-there-was-an-obama-look-alike-contest/comment-page-1/#comment-33015</link>
		<dc:creator>Ant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 07:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://houseonahill.net/?p=6525#comment-33015</guid>
		<description>Yup!! He&#039;s Indonesian. His name is Ilham Anas. He live in Bandung, Indonesia as a Photographer. B-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup!! He&#8217;s Indonesian. His name is Ilham Anas. He live in Bandung, Indonesia as a Photographer. B-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: loy</title>
		<link>http://casaveneracion.com/if-there-was-an-obama-look-alike-contest/comment-page-1/#comment-32383</link>
		<dc:creator>loy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 07:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://houseonahill.net/?p=6525#comment-32383</guid>
		<description>:lol: The real Obama looks better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img src='http://casaveneracion.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif' alt=':lol:' class='wp-smiley' />  The real Obama looks better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

