Comments on: Faces of death http://casaveneracion.com/faces-of-death/ Family, food, photography Sun, 12 Feb 2012 13:23:14 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: trosp http://casaveneracion.com/faces-of-death/comment-page-1/#comment-43910 trosp Sun, 22 Nov 2009 09:48:54 +0000 http://houseonahill.net/?p=11132#comment-43910 Robert, I might as well bestow you with what I would like to call you - an a#1hole, since yo can't cite any conjecture on my part. See you next time.. Robert,

I might as well bestow you with what I would like to call you – an a#1hole, since yo can’t cite any conjecture on my part.

See you next time..

]]> By: trosp http://casaveneracion.com/faces-of-death/comment-page-1/#comment-43909 trosp Sun, 22 Nov 2009 09:36:49 +0000 http://houseonahill.net/?p=11132#comment-43909 Again, you are assuming. This was what I've commented - "It’s not the Darwin’s evolution theory but the theorists. They’re using the evolution theory to prove that God does not exist. These people have committed frauds just to prove their points (try googling “evolution frauds”)." The arguments are in the web. It's not mine. So where is the conjecture on my part? Reading between the lines? What is that? Ah, you're reading between the lines and you have your own assumption. Go figure... Stay classy kid. Again, you are assuming.

This was what I’ve commented -

“It’s not the Darwin’s evolution theory but the theorists. They’re using the evolution theory to prove that God does not exist. These people have committed frauds just to prove their points (try googling “evolution frauds”).”

The arguments are in the web. It’s not mine. So where is the conjecture on my part?

Reading between the lines? What is that? Ah, you’re reading between the lines and you have your own assumption.

Go figure…

Stay classy kid.

]]> By: Robert http://casaveneracion.com/faces-of-death/comment-page-1/#comment-43890 Robert Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:26:29 +0000 http://houseonahill.net/?p=11132#comment-43890 Evolution frauds. Go figure. It's not called assumption, it's reading between the lines. Evolution frauds. Go figure.

It’s not called assumption, it’s reading between the lines.

]]> By: trosp http://casaveneracion.com/faces-of-death/comment-page-1/#comment-43880 trosp Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:56:14 +0000 http://houseonahill.net/?p=11132#comment-43880 Robert, am I using big words such as- "...please educate me specifically what can be misconstrued in my previous comment." "Where are my conjectures? You keep on reinventing things or every time changing the rules of exchanging comments to suit your comfort zone ." Those are big words for you he he he he. And what have you blah blah - "@Trosp: If you cannot figure that one for yourself, I cannot help you. The fact that you did not recognize the allusion to Malakas at Maganda with the bamboo splitting in half is rather frustrating. See I thought that was rather “shoutingly” obvious." Well, when you say Bathala's baking skill, my allusion was on his baking skill. So why would Malakas and Maganda would creep into my mind. Ha ha ha, of course, you're the type of person who would always put words into other people's lips. A person who always assume. Where are my conjectures as you have commented? Where? If you can't cite one then you're an a#1hole. How did I deride the he evolution theorists? By calling those who don't believe in God as "they don't believe in God?" Well, they don't believe in God and they want everybody to know it. I respect their mind. (Did I make any derogatory remarks in that issue or shall we go back in my previous comment of Atheist suing Christians for claiming that non-believers will not be welcome to heaven ). What are you? I've overrated you. Stay classy... Robert, am I using big words such as-

“…please educate me specifically what can be misconstrued in my previous comment.”

“Where are my conjectures? You keep on reinventing things or every time changing the rules of exchanging comments to suit your comfort zone .”

Those are big words for you he he he he.

And what have you blah blah -

“@Trosp: If you cannot figure that one for yourself, I cannot help you. The fact that you did not recognize the allusion to Malakas at Maganda with the bamboo splitting in half is rather frustrating. See I thought that was rather “shoutingly” obvious.”

Well, when you say Bathala’s baking skill, my allusion was on his baking skill. So why would Malakas and Maganda would creep into my mind. Ha ha ha, of course, you’re the type of person who would always put words into other people’s lips. A person who always assume.

Where are my conjectures as you have commented? Where? If you can’t cite one then you’re an a#1hole.

How did I deride the he evolution theorists? By calling those who don’t believe in God as “they don’t believe in God?” Well, they don’t believe in God and they want everybody to know it. I respect their mind. (Did I make any derogatory remarks in that issue or shall we go back in my previous comment of Atheist suing Christians for claiming that non-believers will not be welcome to heaven ).

What are you?

I’ve overrated you.

Stay classy…

]]> By: Robert http://casaveneracion.com/faces-of-death/comment-page-1/#comment-43865 Robert Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:44:58 +0000 http://houseonahill.net/?p=11132#comment-43865 @Trosp: If you cannot figure that one for yourself, I cannot help you. The fact that you did not recognize the allusion to Malakas at Maganda with the bamboo splitting in half is rather frustrating. See I thought that was rather "shoutingly" obvious. Likewise, that you deride evolution theorists and try to get away from your statement about evolution is called intellectual dishonesty. Anyway, what I am writing is bordering on ad hominem but I cannot help it, you asked for. And Trosp, go slow on the big words, just because you're able to use them does not mean shit. Or prove you correct. @Trosp: If you cannot figure that one for yourself, I cannot help you. The fact that you did not recognize the allusion to Malakas at Maganda with the bamboo splitting in half is rather frustrating. See I thought that was rather “shoutingly” obvious. Likewise, that you deride evolution theorists and try to get away from your statement about evolution is called intellectual dishonesty. Anyway, what I am writing is bordering on ad hominem but I cannot help it, you asked for. And Trosp, go slow on the big words, just because you’re able to use them does not mean shit. Or prove you correct.

]]>